Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Sept. 3, 2021

Created

Fri Sep 03 18:49:45 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@karlbykarlsmith @realchrisrufo @DavidAFrench @kmele @thomaschattwill And to expand a bit: *there is a substantive disagreement about how best to oppose and defeat Racecraft nonsense in public schools.* I want that dispute fleshed out, not elided, which is what the *you're functionally helping the other side* claims do: they beg the question. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 3, 2021

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@karlbykarlsmith @realchrisrufo @DavidAFrench @kmele @thomaschattwill I disagree substantively with the idea that the oped serves any single function and also that it serves that function. I also disagree with the garbage headline that the NYT put on it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 3, 2021

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

The core question in my piece on Australia is one few of its critics even attempted to address, so let me repeat it: how long do measures defended as justifiable on the basis that they are "temporary" have to persist before it is reasonable to worry that they are "enduring"? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 3, 2021