Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 7, 2021

Created

Wed Feb 10 01:22:59 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @jessesingal ––that is, that the degree of harm/trauma felt on hearing the word is independent of social norms about whether or not there is an important distinction between use as reference or use as slur, such that the faction that wants to sap power from the word is misguided? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @jessesingal As noted, I think everyone would've been better off if he hadn't, but I have a Q in return: do you think people are a) well-served or b) ill-served by conceiving of uses like that as harms so traumatic as to justify litigating years later, or that c) it *isn't* a choice–– — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @jessesingal To me, that question is a logical extension of the view that we must assess not only intent, but harm. I am, however, unclear on where people stand on it. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 10, 2021 Hibernated