Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 26, 2021

Created

Sun Jan 03 22:06:25 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@rasmansa @scwittan In this case, it means your goal is equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. If equality of outcome was your goal, you'd make sure that everyone wound up with the same reading ability, requiring you to artificially limit the progress of the most talented readers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 3, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ideafaktory Yes agree — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 3, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@rasmansa @scwittan The reason equality of outcome gets such intense pushback, whatever you mean by it, is that the actual meaning would lead to ruin, and when it was attempted, under Communism, did lead to ruin. I don't think anyone *wants ruin* but I do think that lots of people are — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 3, 2021 Hibernated