Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 31, 2021

Created

Wed Oct 14 20:35:01 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @ggreenwald @theintercept I tend to be skeptical of censorship processes that are 1) opaque 2) selectively applied rather than consistently enforced 3) vulnerable to the Streisand effect 4) fuel politically polarizing conspiracy theories and mistrust in viewpoint neutrality. This fails all those tests — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @ggreenwald @theintercept I think we should object to bad processes even when they result in correct outcomes. For example, an illegal police search that turns up evidence of lawbreaking should be criticized, even in instances when it helps to catch a dangerous criminal. Do you agree? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey @ggreenwald @theintercept If truth seeking is the only consideration their should be no censorship. You claim we should consider harm, too, and justify censorship by claiming harm reduction. So you should care very much about the Streisand effect, which could reverse the harm calculation — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 14, 2020 Hibernated