Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 19, 2021

Created

Mon Sep 21 17:18:22 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

But that video exists and is the most direct explanation I've seen from the editor about his thinking on this matter. One relevant clip is here: https://t.co/nSxpJjpHXf The other, cued to moments later is here: https://t.co/PhONnHgZIg — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 21, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

I doubt those attacking us would be persuaded even if there were video of the NYT Mag's editor urging an audience of high schoolers to consider 1619 as the country's foundational date. Even if he said *1619 is our founding year* & the project explored that in a variety of ways. — PolitiTweet.org

A simple question for the @nytimes: If the now-deleted passage about 1619 being "our true founding" was not part o… https://t.co/UyNu9wPdli

Posted Sept. 21, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@coreybowers I hoped to be done when I finished the first thread. Then I saw multiple attacks on others who were telling the truth. Insofar as I see that and have info that corrects the record I will chime in. But this is an unpleasant distraction not a focus. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 21, 2020 Hibernated