Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 16, 2021

Created

Sat Sep 19 11:59:23 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey I know you disagree with my essay. That is fine. It is not at issue here. You think 1619 is our true founding. That's fine too. The 1619 Project argued that 1619 is our true founding. Then someone went back and removed that language from the web. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey My argument is that 1776 is both the *political founding* AND the *true founding*. I allow her abstract argument––and I argue, in response, that it is wrong. And we could leave it there, except that she now denies having made it, despite doing so explicitly. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@ijbailey And NHJ, who explicitly said in an interview that she knew the right would push back because they were arguing that, later contradicted herself by saying that they were not arguing that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 19, 2020 Hibernated