Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Fri Jul 17 20:41:54 +0000 2020

Likes

188

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

The same principle is then applied in guilt-by-association gambits. Let a reader point to a hugely valuable thing that the writer wrote, and the same judge appears, insisting that the reader is complicit in whatever the judge regards as the writer's most wrongheaded view. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

It is now common to see writers judged not by the totality of their work, or their most valuable contributions, but by identifying whatever moment or viewpoint the judge finds most odious, presuming the least charitable explanation for it, and judging on that basis alone. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@gabrielsnyder I don't know the names of the people Andrew is referring to in the column, but since it was fact-checked and published by NY Mag I presume they exist. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated