Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Fri Jul 17 20:19:37 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@MichaelPreston every time it's debated, and if Andrew has a position beyond *we should be able to debate e.g. Murray's book* I don't know what it is. Finally, if NY Mag said we disagree on the meta question and that isn't a debate we indulge in our pages I'd say that is a — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@MichaelPreston First, I do not think "obsessed" is accurate. Second, *no one* agrees with Andrew on everything. Third, I know Andrew believes it was right to publish Murray and detractors in TNR--that is, I know his stance on the meta-debate--but I confess I stop reading — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@MichaelPreston perfectly reasonable decision for a magazine to make, but I don't think it's reasonable to refuse to publish people who take the other side in the meta debate on different subjects — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 17, 2020 Hibernated