Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Wed Jul 08 11:35:21 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Debate among people with substantive disagreements is too rare. But praiseworthy examples happen. Here are two on race and policing: 1) @WesleyLowery going on @wethefifth https://t.co/YmBvPkfzuo 2) This Soho House debate https://t.co/KZZb0agB9z (won IMHO by @radleybalko) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@JohnD_Schneider Because I'm expressing a view on the substance of something without disparaging the person I'm talking to or attacking them personally or urging others to do so or trying to get them shunned or fired or otherwise punished. In what sense is it shaming? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@triofrancos Conserving free speech against its perennial enemies is among the pressing issues of every moment in world history. I bet you think it was important when America was fighting the Nazis, the USSR, and Al Qaeda, despite the seriousness of those struggles. Why not now too? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 8, 2020 Hibernated