Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Tue Jul 07 21:03:38 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Also, aren't the sources who won't talk to Emily because she is associated with Matt using the same logic Emily deploys against Matt to object to his associating with (I think) J.K. Rowling? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted July 7, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

"...the letter, signed as it is by several prominent anti-trans voices and containing as many dog whistles toward anti-trans positions as it does..." Help me understand: what passages are supposed to be "dog whistles toward anti-trans positions"? https://t.co/9xlhrfyo4x — PolitiTweet.org

I sent a version of this to the editors of Vox. (I have redacted some bits that are internal to Vox and shouldn’t b… https://t.co/zm2gtCx85w

Posted July 7, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

Isn't the answer to the last question clearly and indisputably no? Look at the signatories. Noam Chomsky and Anne-Marie Slaughter! Jeet Heer and Cathy Young! Caitlin Flanagan and Gloria Steinem! Michelle Goldberg and David Frum! — PolitiTweet.org

The Harper's letter is revealing a deeper issue: Do we judge opinions/arguments on their merits or on who makes the… https://t.co/ecJhziWKG7

Posted July 7, 2020 Hibernated