Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Thu Jun 25 01:15:56 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@aneeman @tedivm @puiwingtam IMHO that would depend to me on particulars. If a pseudonymous blogger was being profiled and asked that her real name be excluded because she has blogged about a bygone abortion, and that would be inconvenient given her work with a religious charity, would it be wrong to agree? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@aneeman @tedivm @puiwingtam I'm not sure what that means. Are you talking about stuff not on the blog? The blog poss are the extent of my familiarity. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@aneeman @tedivm @puiwingtam Again, you are correct: he does not have that right. A separate question is: do NY Times readers gain anything by having his real name reported in addition to his pseudonym? I can imagine articles where the answer is yes. If it is no, they should not print it. Generally, — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated