Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Thu Jun 25 01:02:17 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@tedivm @aneeman @puiwingtam What you said and what the other poster said are *different things*. And believing them to be irrelevant to pseudonymity is not "moving on" it is a distinct claim — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@aneeman @tedivm @puiwingtam Yes, he does write about his clinical work, which is why he doesn't want patients as readers. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@aneeman @tedivm @puiwingtam Do they have "a right"? No. But I see no reason why a newspaper would deny the request of a person who pseudonymously blogs about her pro-choice beliefs from being named if she said, *It would make some of my psychiatric patients at the VA uncomfortable* — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 25, 2020 Hibernated