Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2020

Created

Sun Jan 26 00:42:47 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@nhannahjones That you mistrust the motives of the signatories does not make the words of praise they offered in th… https://t.co/3C3Fearf66 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@nhannahjones From the 5 historians' letter: "Raising profound, unsettling questions about slavery and the nation’s past and present, as The 1619 Project does, is a praiseworthy and urgent public service." That doesn't seem like a wholesale dismissal. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

What I liked best about the piece was its critique of the critique of "practicing history without a license." The substance is what ultimately matters, not credentials. Other noteworthy exchanges include: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated