Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2020

Created

Sun Jan 26 00:34:31 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

I agree with this, but these were not the critiques cited in the pieces that made claims about wholesale dismissal.… https://t.co/nViMMulKtH — PolitiTweet.org

@conor64 Many of the critiques - really a huge number - contain zero praise. The Federalist, Daily Signal, WSJ, etc… https://t.co/RdhyliumYS

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@JeffreyASachs I hadn't seen that column and agree that it *does* fit the characterization. So Lowry was inconsistent in different pieces. The historians letter, however, and all the pieces I link to in my roundup praise parts of the project — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@nhannahjones From the 5 historians' letter: "Raising profound, unsettling questions about slavery and the nation’s past and present, as The 1619 Project does, is a praiseworthy and urgent public service." That doesn't seem like a wholesale dismissal. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 26, 2020 Hibernated