Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 3, 2020

Created

Tue Jun 18 19:00:18 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

The prudence of that posture is due in part to the fact that talking about the most polarizing parts of a scissor controversy is very unlikely to persuade anyone. Take the Harvard admissions dust-up as an example: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

The article implies a general posture whenever a “scissor” controversy arises—identify the features that make it unusually polarizing, bracket them, and see if there’s anything about the concerns of the side you’re *not* on that can be addressed in ways to which you don’t object. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

W/r/t avowed concerns, one side is intent on preserving a strong stigma against racial slurs, the other on fighting back against cancelling people for dredged up mistakes from their youth. Most people share both concerns, but on closer look, this is a suboptimal case for both: — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 18, 2019 Hibernated