David Weigel

@daveweigel ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 25, 2022

Created

Mon Apr 04 15:31:46 +0000 2022

Likes

622

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Weigel @daveweigel

You don’t really need to speculate, the fact that Garland couldn’t get a vote means that opposing party senates just won’t let POTUS fill the bench anymore. If Dems had the Senate majority in 2020, you think Barrett would have gotten a vote? Be serious. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 4, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

David Weigel @daveweigel

You don’t really need to speculate, the fact that Garland couldn’t get a vote means that opposing party senates just won’t let POTUS fill the bench anymore. If Dems had 51 votes in 2020, you think Barrett would have gotten a vote? Be serious. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 4, 2022 Hibernated Just a Typo

Followed By

David Weigel @daveweigel

@Atrios I should say “gotten confirmed.” But I can imagine Durbin sticking to the Grassley Standard and saying they should wait til Americans decide in this rare case where voting was underway already. The pressure would have been Rs saying not holding a hearing was anti-Catholic. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 4, 2022 Hibernated