David Weigel

@daveweigel ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked April 4, 2022

Created

Sat Apr 02 16:58:10 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Weigel @daveweigel

Gale and Sands are both "no" votes (unsurprisingly). Sands: "Not only would this nominee not define a woman, she wouldn't admit when life began." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2022

Preceded By

David Weigel @daveweigel

Gale and Sanders are both "no" votes (unsurprisingly). Sands: "Not only would this nominee not define a woman, she wouldn't admit when life began." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2022 Deleted after 37 seconds Just a Typo

Followed By

David Weigel @daveweigel

Interestingly, Sands goes after "weak Republicans" right after mentioning Sarah Bloom Raskin's failed Fed nomination... and doesn't mention Pat Toomey, arguably the key senator in defeating that nomination, who the candidates are running to replace. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 2, 2022