David Weigel

@daveweigel ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 29, 2019

Created

Sun Oct 13 16:11:06 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

David Weigel @daveweigel

In Iowa, Biden gets +39 on that Q, Sanders gets +30, Warren gets +6. In NH, Biden is +28, Sanders is +21, Warren is +10. In SC, it’s Biden +42, Sanders +10, Warren +10. And despite that, Warren leads in NH and ties in IA. Same old story: If non-Bidens look electable, watch out. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

David Weigel @daveweigel

As I look at CBS poll I think the gap between voters who think Warren can stand up to Trump (she now leads Biden on that Q) and the gap on whether she’s electability is worth following. In every early state she trails Biden/Sanders on “probably would” beat Trump. 1/2 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

David Weigel @daveweigel

Some of this is in Warren’s hands (run a good campaign, win the next debate). Some of it is out of her hands (voters sticking with Biden despite stumbles, persistent panic that a woman can’t win). But among Dems she’s fought from “no way can she win” to “mmmmaybe?" — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 13, 2019 Hibernated