Peter Baker

@peterbakernyt ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 1, 2021

Created

Sat Jun 20 14:28:54 +0000 2020

Likes

312

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

Trump DOJ admits that as many as half of the six examples of "classified information" identified by a political appointee with no training in classification may not have been classified when Bolton wrote his book but became so only when the political appointee deemed them to be. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 20, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

The NSC career official who completed her review of Bolton's book and determined there were no more changes necessary did not submit an affidavit in favor of Trump DOJ effort to now say there is classified into in it. ⁦@charlie_savage⁩ https://t.co/YCO0fn1Ag3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 20, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

I have no classification training either and have not seen the six examples cited by the government since they're not public, but fwiw having read the book and spent many years covering Washington, there's nothing in it that seems like an obvious national secret. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 20, 2020 Hibernated