Peter Baker

@peterbakernyt ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 6, 2020

Created

Fri Jan 31 04:12:00 +0000 2020

Likes

219

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

As for the second article alleging obstruction of Congress, Alexander calls that "frivolous" because the president has the right to assert privileges. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

Alexander says no more witnesses are needed because the House managers proved their factual case, that Trump withheld aid at least in part to pressure Ukraine to help him against Biden. But while he says that was "inappropriate," it does not merit removal from office. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Peter Baker @peterbakernyt

Alexander: "It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation. When elected officials inappropriately interfere with such investigations ... " — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 31, 2020 Hibernated