Vivek Ramaswamy

@VivekGRamaswamy ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Jan. 5, 2023

Created

Thu Dec 08 00:05:38 +0000 2022

Likes

131

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

People wrongly conflate 230(c)(1) with 230(c)(2). The latter protects companies from liability for removing content “whether or not such material is constitutionally protected.” That’s the one people forget about. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2022

Preceded By

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

If it’s state action in disguise, the Constitution still applies. Make Section 230(c)(2) an opt-in: if you wanted special immunity from state tort liability, then you abide by the same constraints as the government itself, including the First Amendment. https://t.co/Zy1voaAE4Z — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2022

Followed By

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

@jordanbpeterson Fiduciary breach. When they enter these “alliances,” they commit to use client funds to advance social agendas that many of those clients *never* agreed to. Vanguard left the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative today, but they’re still signatories to UNPRI, SASB, TCFD, etc. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 8, 2022