Vivek Ramaswamy

@VivekGRamaswamy ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Oct. 29, 2022

Created

Sat Oct 08 19:26:05 +0000 2022

Likes

603

Retweets

107

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

PayPal probably isn’t protected by Section 230, so it could face legal liability in states with political nondiscrimination statutes. It’s an easier case to make than against a social media platform. — PolitiTweet.org

The “misinformation” police are now extending their reach beyond your social media accounts and into your financial… https://t.co/LdCll0dC00

Posted Oct. 8, 2022

Preceded By

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

@modmothernature @elonmusk @davidmarcus @PayPal Many states have political nondiscrimination statutes, so PayPal could be sued in those states since it’s not protected by Section 230. That’s only a partial solution, but it could be an interesting one. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 8, 2022

Followed By

Vivek Ramaswamy @VivekGRamaswamy

@NewStyle303 @CrimsonPKing Sigh. This takes too long to explain, but here goes: social media companies have cited Sec 230 pre-emotion has an affirmative defense when sued under state nondiscrimination statutes. That defense likely doesn’t apply to PayPal since it isn’t protected by Sec 230. Hope that helps — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 8, 2022 Deleted after 27 seconds Just a Typo