Keith Rothfus

Keith Rothfus @KeithRothfus

(2/4) Significantly, court holds those challenging PA’s mail-in law "have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because [they] have asserted the [PA] Constitution does not provide a mechanism...to allow for expansion of absentee voting w/o a constitutional amendment." — PolitiTweet.org

Keith Rothfus @KeithRothfus

(4/4) More than 150 years of PA Supreme Court precedent support the position of those arguing the mail-in voting law should first have been approved by Pennsylvania’s voters in a constitutional referendum (it never was). The case is about the rule of law. — PolitiTweet.org