Keith Rothfus

@KeithRothfus ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 2, 2022

Created

Tue Jun 16 01:24:51 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Keith Rothfus @KeithRothfus

The Bostock case invites lawyers to scrutinize every law ever passed to find words whose meaning may have changed over time & have the courts apply a new meaning. This absolves Congress of the need to update & rewrite laws, especially when disputed matters are involved. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Keith Rothfus @KeithRothfus

When Congress passes a law, should it foresee how a word may change in meaning over time? With today’s #Bostock decision, the #SupremeCourt once again invades the province of Congress. No legislator who voted on the 1964 Civil Rights Act would have envisioned today’s result. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Keith Rothfus @KeithRothfus

“[T]his is an unhealthy way to make law in a democracy....Congress for years has been debating bills to amend the statute...the Court just did its work for it..." Congress’ power is again taken away & the people have-again-lost their voice in lawmaking. https://t.co/hhkQq2wg77 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 16, 2020 Hibernated