Dr. Jill Stein🌻

@DrJillStein ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Nov. 11, 2019

Created

Fri May 03 15:08:26 +0000 2019

Likes

133

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Dr. Jill Stein🌻 @DrJillStein

3/ 2018 Canova-DWS was marred by hackable voting machines with modems and chain of custody violations that could allow party operatives to tamper with ballots and go undetected. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 3, 2019

Preceded By

Dr. Jill Stein🌻 @DrJillStein

2/ Here are some highlights, or lowlights, actually, of DWS vs Canova 2018. For starters, it was supervised by DWS crony Brenda Snipes, who illegally destroyed ballots after Canova’s challenge in 2016, conveniently blocking an investigation Canova was pursuing in court. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 3, 2019

Followed By

Dr. Jill Stein🌻 @DrJillStein

4/ Canova’s vote count, roughly 5% across all groups, was as likely as winning the lottery every day for a year, according to statistics expert Dr. David Bader, chair of GA Tech’s School of Computational Science. That included LatinX, White, Black, female, Dem & no-party voters. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 3, 2019