Martin Heinrich

@MartinHeinrich ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Dec. 1, 2020

Created

Thu Aug 20 14:14:50 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Martin Heinrich @MartinHeinrich

NAHB led the charge to remove bipartisan provisions that encouraged the adoption of newer, more efficient building codes from the Senate's energy bill earlier this year. The codes would not have been mandatory for states or local governments to adopt. https://t.co/PSVWcLmXDP — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2020

Preceded By

Martin Heinrich @MartinHeinrich

It's because NAHB, a lobbying group, represents the housing industry. Not home buyers/owners/renters. Not families. While more energy efficient homes can cut carbon emissions & help fight the climate crisis, the housing industry sees them as bad for business. They're wrong. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2020

Followed By

Martin Heinrich @MartinHeinrich

NAHB opposed the change because stronger energy efficiency requirements in building codes "harm housing affordability." But home buyers want more energy efficient homes, and these homes will reduce consumers' energy costs long-term. Make it make sense. https://t.co/chved0qi9d — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 20, 2020